VIKTOR
@thedefivillain
Why is $VVV only buying back $200k a month if they are going to have $100M+ yearly revenue?
May 20
616948.1K74
VIKTORUnverified
@thedefivillain
$VVV is a good example to see how the sheer ROI of a coin pump is less relevant to call a top on it than the trading volume.
Despite being now up more than 10x from bottom (which is probably the best performance YTD for a non-scam coin), there are no "strong" sign of VVV being topped.
The largest volume day was just a bit more than $500M, which is quite limited and suggests that we're far from saturation in terms of attention or inflows.
Obviously, you have to be aware that most coins top wit
Apr 28
2926444.0K40
VIKTOR
@thedefivillain
@ErikVoorhees You mean that thing where the equity holders accrue the value, or is this model different?
May 20
202.7K
VIKTOR
@thedefivillain
@AviFelman Only $HYPE does genuinely drive value to its token
$VVV has the usual token<>equity conflict and $TON is sold to make Telegram money
May 21
222.0K
VIKTOR
@thedefivillain
@ErikVoorhees So it's the same token<>equity conflict model as usual, fair enough
May 20
91.4K
VIKTOR
@thedefivillain
@AskVenice $1 burn per new subscription? wtf
Better not to have a buyback & burn mechanism than having such a ridiculously small one
Apr 16
4458
Venice-related activity by @thedefivillain on X โ data publicly available, refreshed daily. Profile cached today.
